Nik software - color efex pro 3 full free free
Looking for:
Nik software - color efex pro 3 full free free - |
Nik software - color efex pro 3 full free free -
- Nik software - color efex pro 3 full free free
And, of course, you can adjust the strength of different filters, stack them and use control points for a huge amount of flexibility. Using the ClearView slider, you can easily cut through mist, haze and fog, giving your images more detail and contrast. Color Efex also includes 29 brand-new authentic film grains, which DxO developed using real-world film stocks in its lab.
The available effects are inspired by more than years of historic photography and let you reimagine your digital photos using looks inspired by classic cameras, lenses and film processes. You can also add different effects to your photos, like burnt edges, scratches, light leaks or grain. Perspective Efex now supports more than 20 Fujifilm cameras and 40 lenses, although it retains the older look and feel. For more information, visit DxO.
I've been using this product for many years. I originally bought it before Google took it over and it became free!! That thrilled me - not. In November they brought out ver. So there were advantages mainly with Silver Efex, so I upgraded.
Now they want me to upgrade further to vers 5!!! In another 9 months they'll have ver. So for me the answer is a resounding NO. I get your point but in contrary, they could have opted for a subscription fee like Adobe. At least with Nik, you get your version forever. Love esp the black and white options in Silver FX. In addition I dabble a bit with Luminar Neo which is interesting in that it offers a very different approach.
I paid full price for the Nik collection and also for the HDR tool before they went to google for free. I lost my older version with a computer upgrade.
Now I am expected to pay full upgrade price for Nik 5. I don't know why they would be "cynical". PeterJmTim Completely irrelevant. I have no complaint about what happened when Nik was not in the hands of DXO, except for the contrast in customer relations with the current owners.
The cynicism is about requiring me to pay again for an upgrade 2 months after I just paid. That is cynical. It allows to perform such precise adjustment. Turn on mask visualisation to see what they actually do. David I do understand how they work, but there are many times I want to control which exact area I want to modify. I want to control the edit and not the tool. When the sun going through the clouds or branches scatters lights on grass , rock, water, etc.
The elliptical shapes that Adobe has allows for such narrow and precise shape control that makes it far superior. I certainly agree that U-Points have their limitations, the first being that the approach is totally different to pretty much everybody else, so their effect is not that intuitive.
Basically U-Points are sample-point defined luminance masks, with all the advantages but also complexity these bring. Well, not so much new, but color Efex 5 seems to be a lot faster did not measure if so it is worth the cost - but 59 was enough to spent I use it so much, that it is ok for me and I am happy it stays in development.
Some more innovation would be welcome! I bought nik when it originally was sold in a box! I have been upgrading sporadically over the years.
Complained about the first DXO upgrade and lack of support for 4k resolution in all the programs. Now I finally figured out why! So they can keep charging for upgrades yearly.. Nice business models sarcasm. I also bought NIK when it was sold in a box, just before the product was sold to another company. Still use the products as plug-ins in Lightroom and never updated. Still fine They are desperate, they need money Today I had update from Microsoft and from Adobe Nik efex are plug-ins for Photoshop.
And you don't need to spend money for them year on year. I am still working with a 7 year old version without problems. I wanted silver fx and viveza updated cause I only use those too mostly now.. I think other companies do better at sharpening. The suite might have been "modernised", but beware: Nik Collection 4 BROKE Silver Efex's backward compatibility in that you are now not able to open anymore adjustments created with previous versions and saved as Smart Objects.
I seriously hope that this version didn't break Colour Efex and the other plugins as well like they did with Silver Efex, but fixed the Silver Efex problem instead. Well, Nik Collection was my first 'serious' color correction package now I work exclusively in CO22 , so it's nice to see that this package is not abandoned.
I still think that we need more neural processing in plugins akin of Luminar only with real support on the long distance lol and Nik Collection has great potential for such tech. On the plus side, DXO is taking care of Nik.
We once thought it was going to be abandoned. On the minus side, they're selling new versions every year and at increasing cost. Image editing software in that doesn't work fully on a 4K monitor. Fix the basics, please! PhotoLab suffers the same underwhelming upgrades. It's my favourite raw editor but please, again, fix the basics! At least it works fully on a 4K monitor. For example, if you are going to use such unconventional keyboard shortcuts at least give us editable shortcuts My guess it's some sort of legacy code that's too expensive to actually rewrite.
DxO bankrupted not long ago, you see. But yeah, It's getting utterly silly at this point, because even on Windows QHD is a bare minimum for design work.
I've used Nik products since they first came out and upgraded appropriately. It's been DxO's baby for a long while and I appreciate the progress they've made.
However, when I did the last free upgrade to 4. I saw it happened to others online as well. I communicated with their technical help for weeks and it was impossible to get any help. The representative never seemed to understand the problem.
I just reinstalled PSE and didn't install the Nik plug-ins. Using them without layers is a drag. I gave up Photoshop. There have been bugs all along, but eventually they got worked out. Now I wonder if they're making me buy a new version so it will work the way it should. You may have to upgrade to elements That's what I did and Nik works fine with that. The software companies are making it so you have to upgrade every year. With Apple leading the way.
It seems like every OS update causes software incompatibility. They recently listed PSE as incompatible with Nik 4, even though I was using it fine until the 4. It was easier to just list it as incompatible rather than fix their update. Their tech rep kept running me through diagnostic assignments, dragging me along for weeks. It was a community member who posted a link to the new chart saying PSE was done. I know, that can be done by grouping multiple points, but it's an extra step.
Or, maybe newer versions already allow this, e. Most of my control points are a combination of multiple points. And most of them have a bunch of "negative" points associated with them, so that might be another nice addition.
A second complaint: I now get a pop-up window asking me to pay for an upgrade every time I start Silver Efex Pro version 2 in my case. There is no option to turn this off. IMHO not a nice thing to do: Purposely make the old product less pleasant to use to get people to upgrade. Special effects, yes. Deforming and modeling colors into the blind. Playing intuitively with images. For those who can't get enough of it. Creating glossy pictures that breathe like plastic.
Photography looses all it authenticity. Are we still able to make an image first allright how it should need to be? Where are the monitoring tools to see what we are actually doing? Histograms should consist of lines instead of colored areas, because the colors they create have no relation with each other.
Red and green levels can just be reds and greens without any yellow, or vice versa. A bunch of panels, but empty. I shudder from U-points. This concept disrupts completely the continuity of the analog world.
They permit easy results, but you probably pass by to make the basic adjustments first and finally mess up the whole picture. We are flooded with deforming filters, but I get tired of it. I would be more impressed with clear controls that shows what actually happens. And don't forget the horror of ruining analog photos by dodging and burning them by hand. Ansel Adams started with perfectly exposed negatives and then ruined them in the darkroom. A "real" artist will only print exactly what the original image looked like.
PixieMeister - "Are we still able to make an image first allright how it should need to be? I saw your reaction only lately Yes there are rigid technically guide lines you can't get around. Such as the visible spectrum is continuous. This means that a camera can and will contain shift errors in hue, but you cannot twist the spectral order of it. They must remain congruent, otherwise the color rendering will be no longer a natural representation of the original scene.
In that view are U-point horrible! Except for you intentionally want to make a fantasy image of coarse. Same for luminance and saturation. And all these values need to stay in the resolution volume of the choosen bitdepth. If not, colors will ceiling together and again show false values. Just re-installed for photoshop had an issue with PS that required a re-install. Granted, I've stopped using some of the plug-ins like HDR Efex in favor of other programs Photomattix but still find the free version from Google to be useful and I never personally had a crash as i know people did complain about that too with the free Google version.
It seems that it's still lacking some aspects, and considering I don't even use the Google version all that much not all the time probably just as well I didn't bother spending the money. I'm sure for some people, it's good value the now-paid version, but based on some comments I see here, there's room for much improvement apparently.
I'm using the free version on my iMac. But when trying the installer. Maybe later they'll have a better offer that will temp me. But for now, pass. I've toyed with the idea of upgrading but I don't really see the benefit for me. Even though I paid a fortune for it, I still think I've got my money's worth. I know I could download the trial but I've done that more times than I care to already. DXO keeps trying to shock this formerly free zombie software back to life and charge for it.
And it was serveral 's of DM each plugin, later, when Google bought the Nik Collection - much cheaper into contrast, all plugins for something like EUR only. I haven't upgraded for a long time, but still using it. FYI, it was never being free - only when Google abandoned it, then it was being "free", and one could still DL the old 1.
But software development comes at a price, programers, beta testers, marketing, etc. Those guys, always thinking it's for free Always the same sort of comment, when a new version comes out here I'd like to mention, when you get the Nik Collection v5, there's a free license for DxO PhotoLab v5 also being included. Not the "Elite" version, but the essential release, well better than nothing, as Nik Collection plugin host.
Just read that on the DxO Website here:. And if the 3 old plugins are now being fullscreen - which should've been updated into v4. Nik Dfine, Viveza and Sharpener Pro have been the tools without fullscreen mode here. We're busting DXO's balls, because they haven't upgraded to 4K capability for how many years now? And they wanted full retail, too. The rest of the tools are worthless, at least to me because I never use presets.
And finally, mein herr, Reilly Diefenbach if you didn't know is an unseen character in the movie Fargo, a Cohen Bros homage to the movie Seven Days in May. I use the older previously free Google version of the NIK plugins, which I had to pay for initially plugins almost on a daily basis. Mainly Viveza and the Color Efex Pro 4 plugins. They still work almost great with the current PS CC I'm using 2 x 27" 4K IPS monitors.
There hasn't been word on it anywhere so far. In other words, no integration to speak of, and most of the time too cumbersome for me to use it. The former is useful for the purpose of aligning images, which is required when images are shot hand-held.
The latter ensures the merge looks good. This has four settings — None, Low, Medium, and High — and it will eliminate problems caused by moving subjects in your photos. EasyHDR is an interesting program. In fact, if it had detailed post-processing tools, it could be the best HDR software available.
I also like the different presets the program has to offer, and despite the lack of high-end editing tools, I feel it is a well-rounded product. It has a simple loading screen with options for single-image HDR processing or batch processing. The batch-processing feature is highly useful if you have multiple files that you want to render with similar parameters.
The HDR rendering process is powerful and gives the user great control. Provided you have a decent-spec computer, your files will process quickly. I also like that you can individually edit each layer of the HDR composite once it has been processed, which gives you a far greater level of control and depth for your images!
We previously covered HDR Projects 7, and while I felt it had great potential, certain aspects let it down. For example, the HDR quality was not the best — the images themselves were decent, but sometimes the final result was not what I expected. The HDR process is straightforward, although the user interface is sometimes confusing. Beginners may struggle to get started with the program, though if you persevere, you may be very pleased with your results!
And HDR Projects 8 Pro does have an excellent array of presets and a great selection of post-processing tools. I feel that if the user interface were improved, this could be an outstanding HDR program. HDRtist NX provides good control for small detail processing, and it does a solid job of handling large files, too.
HDRtist NX shows a lot of promise. It offers a fair number of tools to adjust tonality, color, and sharpness in your HDR compositions. And with the ability to hone in on the small details and handle large files, HDRtist is a solid contender as a comprehensive HDR editing program. Nevertheless, there are some areas that definitely need a little more attention from the developers. While the software does have a lot of easy-to-apply presets and effects, they tend to be too heavy-handed to use in any sort of professional setting.
Fortunately, when working manually, you can bring out details without straying too far from reality. I hope you have found the above information insightful. Please do not dismiss any of these programs — they are all viable choices and offer great HDR functionality. It is clear, however, that HDR Merge is the overall winner. It is an exceptional option that is easy to use.
Of course, while Photomatix is great, you must consider your own situation and requirements before buying. I would suggest looking at the following points when deciding:. Thanks for this! Been thinking about adding a little HDR to my work and this is a nice simple guide.
I did not know LR had a basic choice to try this! I took the same 3 bracketed images then to EasyHDR, after a little adjustments, result were slightly better, then I went to Aurora HDR , started the image loading, it took longer time to render, but then.. I got shocked with the result! The default merge was stunning, what a smart software! In general I agree with the points raised in each of the top 4 products. In my opinion Aurora HDR wins hands down for ease of use, workflow integration and ultimately in the quality of final results.
However, Skylum has seemingly stopped supporting it. Moreover, although they claim they are working on an update they offer no projected release date and instead recommend converting all RAW images to.
My Z7 raws when exported as jpeg have visible barrel distortion. I reported that to them in and recently tried Aurora and this still has been fixed!
At the present time I am using Lightroom 4. Your email address will not be published. Save my name and email in this browser to see the comment immediatley and edit it if needed.
You can clear your browser data at any time. Notify me via e-mail if anyone answers my comment. Summary show. Nik HDR Efex. Adobe Lightroom Classic.
Comments
Post a Comment